Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Fighting For The Tax Payer....
Fighting For The Tax Payer....
By Blackvegetable
6 Jan 2026 3:45 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 Jan 2026 7:20 am
Keep going for that yarn.Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ The innumerate California State Auditor has found plenty of fraud which you like to ignore.
I2025-1 Investigations of Improper Activities by State Agencies and Employees - California State Auditor https://share.google/nT7fYh08RMRjhMGBa
Keep opening your mouth, while Democrats take a big **** in it!
There will be more......
7 Jan 2026 7:21 am
BV AKA SHILLY WILLY THE *** LIBERAL SHILL
7 Jan 2026 7:24 am
Please give me space to miss @RebelGator
7 Jan 2026 7:31 am
Yes, there will be more and you will deny all of it!
7 Jan 2026 7:38 am
DEFINE THE TERM WOMAN AND I MAY
7 Jan 2026 7:49 am
I haven't denied anything yet.
I am very skeptical of the scales asserted, and have never bought the fiscal concerns of people who have demonstrated a consistent indifference to the fiscal consequences of their votes.
7 Jan 2026 9:33 am
My pocketbook votes against collectivism.Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ I haven't denied anything yet.
I am very skeptical of the scales asserted, and have never bought the fiscal concerns of people who have demonstrated a consistent indifference to the fiscal consequences of their votes.
Enjoy your Trump tax cuts.
7 Jan 2026 9:35 am
has anyone?Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Have either of you ever cast a vote for a POTUS who bequeathed a smaller deficit to his successor than what he inherited?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
7 Jan 2026 9:36 am
No...it is in the hands of a recidivist innumerate rubeFuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ My pocketbook votes against collectivism.
Enjoy your Trump tax cuts.
7 Jan 2026 9:37 am
Yes...I've done so consistently.
7 Jan 2026 9:42 am
Don't worry, it will be over in three years. You can try that Bidenomics again with another chosen idiot.Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ No...it is in the hands of a recidivist innumerate rube
7 Jan 2026 9:45 am
How can we determine what's "idiotic"?Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Don't worry, it will be over in three years. You can try that Bidenomics again with another chosen idiot.
Assuming we aren't strapped to a yahoo feedbag.
Dueling adjectives?
7 Jan 2026 9:47 am
The Feds are sending something like 200 agents to Minnesota and have already made nearly 100 arrests.Fuelman » 06 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ That's a little late after the accusations of billions in fraud from blue states. (And I'm sure red states also)
No one will remember this lame attempt to save taxpayer money.
I cant wait to see how all this money just got siphoned off
7 Jan 2026 10:07 am
**** your whimpering.Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2026, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Five years after the U.S. Capitol attack, some Senate Democrats are introducing new legislation to prevent taxpayer money from being awarded to convicted and now-pardoned rioters.
One of the new Senate bills, reviewed Tuesday by CBS News, would outlaw the establishment of any compensation fund to award money to rioters. Another piece of legislation would prohibit the use of federal tax money to pay for civil legal settlements against Jan. 6 defendants who were convicted of assaulting police.
The latter of the two bills is titled the "No Settlements for 5 January 6 Law Enforcement Assaulters Act." It is sponsored by Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who serves as vice-chair of the Senate Rules Committee, which has oversight of the Capitol grounds and the U.S. Capitol Police. The legislation is also sponsored by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat who serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
5 years after Jan. 6 attack, Senate Democrats seek to ban taxpayer-funded payouts to Capitol rioters -
CBS News https://share.google/aclI42FE5Mv4PV4YY
Here is the deal:
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Jan 2026 10:09 am
It's clear Kamala's word salad made complete sense to you.
7 Jan 2026 10:13 am
That doesn't answer the question...Fuelman » 07 Jan 2026, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ It's clear Kamala's word salad made complete sense to you.
7 Jan 2026 10:13 am
This again. Look at my sig, hypocrite boy.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
7 Jan 2026 10:14 am
Nothing in it for me.
Tell Coozie to put my thread back, and I'll think about it.
7 Jan 2026 10:16 am
Are these your words?
viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697
7 Jan 2026 10:17 am
CP made it clear you don't get to ask questions.
Who is online
In total there are 5688 users online :: 14 registered, 17 bots, and 5657 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: CensysInspect, SiteLockSpider, aiohttp, Bolt, proximic, okhttp, ADmantX, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, CriteoBot, curl/7, bingbot