I keep the receipts...FJB » 08 Jan 2026, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ keep trying, and while you are trying... define the term woman
SO WHAT...the TRUTH gets your panties in a TWIST?
That truth being that they had no reason to ban me.ConservativeWave » 08 Jan 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ SO WHAT...the TRUTH gets your panties in a TWIST?
HA !!
Get a CLUE !!
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ That truth being that they had no reason to ban me.
For life.
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ That truth being that they had no reason to ban me.
For life.
There was a GMC vehicle named Typhoon as well.Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ There's a forum run by some FOX twat and moderated by someone calling themselves "typhoon"..
At one point typhoon revealed a subtle grammatical tic...and even with my paltry russian, I called it out. Also, apparently no one had ever mentioned the fact that "typhoon" is a class of soviet submarines.....which got me swiftly escorted out of the building.
It was a modified s-10..
It belonged to the destroyer class; however, not a submarine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon-class_submarine*Roshambo » 08 Jan 2026, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ It belonged to the destroyer class; however, not a submarine.
I am referring to the modified S-10
It belonged to the destroyer class; however, not a submarine.
*Roshambo » 08 Jan 2026, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I am referring to the modified S-10
It belonged to the destroyer class; however, not a submarine.
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ the s-10 was the Blazer it started as...
I had one, with a stick shift
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.