Liberal Forum

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 1:50 pm

        And where do you find these archives you dumb pos?

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm

From the profile tab....

But I don't give a **** about you....I just go to the motherlode of your Stupid.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:10 pm

You dig in my profile for hours on end

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:12 pm

Only your archives...

And it doesn't take long.

But I don't give a **** about you..

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 1:42 pm

Tell us again about how Trump raped Carroll........

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm

So you admit you stalk me then. 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm

From the profile tab....

But I don't give a **** about you....I just go to the motherlode of your Stupid.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:21 pm

No more than I "stalk" authors in a library.

But you indisputably stalk me.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:29 pm

Do you go through the author's profile? 

Projecting...again. You are on a roll with your projections today.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm

These are books, you **** idiot.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:40 pm

And? We have profiles here. Moron. 

You go through my profile, as well as many other members here. That makes you mentally ill and psychotic. 

Kill yourself.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:45 pm

No...stalking makes you mentally ill and psychotic.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:47 pm

And the projection continues. 

Damn. You are on a roll. 

1. You will accuse me of projecting...hence, you will project again.   

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:53 pm

Are these your words?

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:55 pm

Your memory is ****. 

Didn't click it
Are these my words?

God you are so **** dense. STUPID! STUPID! STUPID!

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:56 pm

Looks to me like your predictions are ****.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

1.  Veghead:
         “Are these your words” or posting my threads 

My reply:
       Are these my words?I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.God you are so **** dense. STUPID! STUPID!         STUPID! 

2. Veghead:
              For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source." 

My reply: 
             My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external         verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And  Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.   

3. For your demands/question 
Reply:
        **** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean? 

4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question 
Reply:
         The question is not asking for definitions.
         The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.


5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply: 
       projecting again


6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply: 
       Copies me again. pile up that evidence.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm

Yeah, but that's a @Blackvegetable  move. BV loves creeping around in people's profile. I don't want to be anything like that stalker.

JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm

Our profiles are in the domain.  What is in your profile that is so sensitive?  You are fool if you put anything on it that dox's you.

What is so creepy about digging into what people have said?

AI analyzed this bytch site for me wth perfection. I shared the experience.  Now this site no longer exist according to AI.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:15 pm

Nothing is sensitive. It is creepy. Normal people don't spend hours and hours in a member's profile, then save a special folder, dedicated to said member, on their computer. That is not normal behavior.