Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:20 pm

Trump is claiming he can arrest people based on their social media posts and if they are against him.  That is creepy.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm

I haven't seen him post as much as he used to. BV misses him.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

DeezerShoove » 07 Jan 2026, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:26 pm

He has me on "Whiny Baby Duty" . . .
Kinda like KP in the army.

I only killed his father again. Didn't clean up the mess.
I couldn't tell which he was more pissed about.

So, since that duty is 90% of the time spent here, he floats in and out.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:25 pm

He probably already has.

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:27 pm

Next time, clean up the mess. Unless you dismembered him. Then **** it. Leave the pieces there.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

NateHiggas » 07 Jan 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 2:21 pm

Oh, yeah, that's a good one. 

JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm

Our profiles are in the domain.  What is in your profile that is so sensitive?  You are fool if you put anything on it that dox's anything about you you don't want to be revealed.

What is so creepy about digging into what people have said?

AI analyzed this bytch site for me with perfection one day. I shared the experience.  Now this site no longer exists according to AI.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:35 pm

Wonder why someone always in my face gets hysterical about what information they volunteer about themselves...

I suspect idiocy.
.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm

Only a totally brainwashed Turnip Truck Driver [like BV] would take the word of a Professional Rape Victim  [like Jean Carroll] who claims she has been raped 7 times by 7 different men.....

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:37 pm

So how much of the judge's response to Team Grifty did you read?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:36 pm

What have I volunteered about myself that has your panties all wadded up?

JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:29 pm

The super creep is Miller and Homan..  60,000 minor unattended immigrant children "saved". I heard an account of a plane load of kids getting fedsexed out of the country. to god knows where. Where are they?  I would be claiming kudos for the effort to "save" children.

 They were in cages in his first term.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:39 pm

I have no idea......I don't go through your profile.


What is in your profile that gets your panties in a wad?

1.  Veghead:
         “Are these your words” or posting my threads 

My reply:
       Are these my words?I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.God you are so **** dense. STUPID! STUPID!         STUPID! 

2. Veghead:
              For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source." 

My reply: 
             My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external         verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And  Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.   

3. For your demands/question 
Reply:
        **** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓
↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean?

 

4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question 
Reply:
         The question is not asking for definitions.
         The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.


5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply: 
       projecting again


6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply: 
       Copies me again. pile up that evidence.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm

I haven't seen him post as much as he used to. BV misses him.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:37 pm

So how much of the judge's response to Team Grifty did you read?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:47 pm

Only a t

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 4:18 pm

Blah...blah...Facts.....blah....
blah...Logic...blah....

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:40 pm

You people never showed any concern about the child trafficking when Biden was president...in fact you people  called it a RW Conspiracy Theory

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 4:21 pm

Only a 

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 3:41 pm

Lie. 

never answered my survivorship bias question, so you don't answer the first time habitually.

and 6.

Ahhhhh.....this is much easier.