Correction: I only don't answer your questions, because you don't answer mine.
But I DO answer yours, liar.Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Correction: I only don't answer your questions, because you don't answer mine.
1. Pic...prove first time. Prove a negative. I forgot to add this one on the list. I'll do it next time.
besides the shear pressure it takes...DeezerShoove » 07 Jan 2026, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You ever cut off a leg?
I don't know how the serial killers do that on a regular basis.
Heavy, messy, slippery, bendy, prolly stinky too.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom **** that...unless you're linking it...JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The super creep is Miller and Homan.. 60,000 minor unattended immigrant children "saved". I heard an account of a plane load of kids getting fedsexed out of the country. to god knows where. Where are they? I would be claiming kudos for the effort to "save" children.
They were in cages in his first term.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ^^^ stolen notes from therapist....Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No...stalking makes you mentally ill and psychotic.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Join the boycott!
And your *** is black and blue from 31 horse dicks pounding you!JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The Epstien Flies are red and blue. They are eating America's corpse.
Cannon calls me a Groomer. Looks to me like there are arrows pointed at Trump from my perspective.
You really should be asking yourself..."How do I get My Richard out Of Cannon?"murdock » 07 Jan 2026, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ And your *** is black and blue from 31 horse dicks pounding you!

To jurors, this was a no brainer*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Only a totally brainwashed Turnip Truck Driver [like BV] would take the word of a Professional Rape Victim [like Jean Carroll] who claims she has been raped 7 times by 7 different men.....
We all know this for a fact...if BV had been convicted of rape without any proof...he would be screaming BLOODY MURDER right now.....
Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ To jurors, this was a no brainer
https://youtu.be/0E4GnMcSycU?si=5GIq1eCQ_PGAVK7O
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
to whom must I justify my response?
So you agree that your standards don't apply to you, because you demand everyone else to justify theirs.
Read it again.Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ So you agree that your standards don't apply to you, because you demand everyone else to justify theirs.
QED.
Lame.