Liberal Forum

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:48 pm

No. Your perpetual hypocrisy earned your place on my sig already.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:49 pm

To whom must I justify my response?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:50 pm

So you agree that your standards don't apply to you, because you demand everyone else to justify theirs. 

QED.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:51 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:51 pm

To whom?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:55 pm

So you agree that your standards don't apply to you, because you demand everyone else to justify theirs. 

QED. 

Siggghhhhh.....

JohnnyYou » 07 Jan 2026, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 6:56 pm

You really should be asking yourself..."How do I get My Richard out Of Cannon?"

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:00 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:00 pm

Ok...so I don't need to do that.

When I answer this question again, what will you do in return?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:06 pm

You clearly haven't been paying attention. I don't care if you answer it or not. That is why this is a win-win for me. 

If you don't answer, then you continue to prove yourself a coward.
If you do answer, then you will be humiliated, because your definition is half-assed and ****. 

I win either way.

If you don't answer, then you continue to prove yourself a coward.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:10 pm

wouldn't that make YOU a coward?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 8:19 pm

To jurors, this was a no brainer

https://youtu.be/0E4GnMcSycU?si=5GIq1eCQ_PGAVK7O

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:15 pm

Sorry Little Guy....that is not evidence of rape.
Try again....!   

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm

It leaves an impression.....

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:15 pm

No, you **** moron. Which one of us is doing the evading? 

Come on. Your stupidity is just...uggghhhh. Never mind.

If you don't answer, then you continue to prove yourself a coward.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:20 pm

Does this apply to you?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 07 Jan 2026, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:21 pm

Yes. But the question isn't for me, now is it? 

If you don't answer my questions, then I don't have to answer yours. That is how the rules remain equally applicable. 

Fair is fair, hypocrite boy.

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:24 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:24 pm

But this one is

Are these your words?

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697

1.  Veghead:
         “Are these your words” or posting my threads 

My reply:
       Are these my words?I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.God you are so **** dense. STUPID! STUPID!         STUPID! 

2. Veghead:
              For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source." 

My reply: 
             My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external         verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And  Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.   

3. For your demands/question 
Reply:
        **** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓
↓
↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean?


 

4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question 
Reply:
         The question is not asking for definitions.
         The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.


5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply: 
       projecting again


6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply: 
       Copies me again. pile up that evidence.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm

It leaves an impression.....

In her book Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted at least 5 times...at least three of those times she claims were rape.

Sorry. Little Guy.....but nobody has been raped / sexually assaulted that many times by that many different men....  
What a coincidence that she also happens to be a **** gossip columnist and a professional story teller too...!      
The dress she claims she was wearing when Trump raped her did not even exist during the rough "time frame" she claims that Trump raped her...  
Carroll very conveniently can't remember the exact year, [for some reason]....

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 9:55 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:55 pm

In her book Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted at least 5 times...at least three of those times she claims were rape.


 

Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 9:58 pm

I have no idea what the **** is wrong with you...

Courts are were facts are established....not the pages of breitbart.

In her book Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted at least 5 times...at least three of those times she claims were rape.

Sorry. Little Guy.....but nobody has been raped / sexually assaulted that many times by that many different men....   
What a coincidence that she also happens to be a **** gossip columnist and a professional story teller too...!       
The dress she claims she was wearing when Trump raped her did not even exist during the rough "time frame" she claims that Trump raped her...   
Carroll very conveniently can't remember the exact year, [for some reason]....

The fact is....there were no witnesses, no physical evidence of any sort  and Carroll is not even close to being credible.
Now go jump up and down and stomp your feet some more....I COMMAND YOU ..!!         

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Jan 2026, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Jan 2026, 10:04 pm

In her book