Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑ For what?
Can you link me to the jury's determination?
It's like that $5,000 check, Ruby...
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ It's like that $5,000 check, Ruby...
For months, President Donald Trump or members of his administration have used federal data showing a large increase in employment for U.S.-born workers and a decrease in employment among foreign-born workers to claim that “all net job creation” in his second term has been for citizens. And for months, multiple economists and labor experts have said that officials should not do that because these specific figures are misleading.
The figures can mislead because the reported levels of native- and foreign-born workers are influenced by predetermined population estimates for 2025 that the Census Bureau calculated in 2024.
https://www.factcheck.org/2025/12/trump ... e-figures/
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Don't ask questions..Vegas » 08 Jan 2026, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Look at this. 2 **** questions. You are irreversible control freak. All you do is hide.
HIDE! HIDE! HIDE!
Coozie does, therefore we do.
Vegas » 08 Jan 2026, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't answer them anyway.
1. Pic...well, you know the drill.
So it's a wash?Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... f=lMtIv2Vb The Guy Who Thought Up ‘the Wall’ Says Trump Should Shut Government to Fund It
Inside Trump’s circle, the power of illegal immigration to manipulate popular sentiment was readily apparent, and his advisers brainstormed methods for keeping their attention-addled boss on message. They needed a trick, a mnemonic device. In the summer of 2014, they found one that clicked. “Roger Stone and I came up with the idea of ‘the Wall,’ and we talked to Steve [Bannon] about it,” said Nunberg. “It was to make sure he talked about immigration.”
Initially, Trump seemed indifferent to the idea. But in January 2015, he tried it out at the Iowa Freedom Summit, a presidential cattle call put on by David Bossie’s group, Citizens United. “One of his pledges was, ‘I will build a Wall,’ and the place just went nuts,” said Nunberg. Warming to the concept, Trump waited a beat and then added a flourish that brought down the house. “Nobody,” he said, “builds like Trump.”
The Wall quickly became Trump’s signature campaign promise—his “Free Bird,” something fans called for at stadium rallies. It signified his commitment to passing hardline immigration laws, which won him the loyal support of right-wing television personalities, such as Ann Coulter, whose approval he craves.
Think about that.....
ICE is now spending 180 billion per year.
Civil Rights are being routinely violated, court orders flaunted and now Americans are being killed.
Over a **** "mnemonic device" for a pixilated sock puppet.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Are you **** kidding?
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you **** kidding?
Catering to your ignorance is expensive, Ruby...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
That's all it's about, brown...Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Because it isn't about that, obviously.
Remember, you voted for a rapist felon, who wouldn't have been on the ballot - had we followed the laws on the books.
Nod.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Don't reframe your lie, Coward.
And don't rebleat old ones.