My mom did too! Can she play?
All I remember from college is the Primordial Soup.
Lie to you, or get longstroked by a brother?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
You're lying, demoralized.and limbless, in a pool of your own waste.
Speaking of your lying, post your usual lie about this:Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You're lying, demoralized.and limbless, in a pool of your own waste.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Don't make me activate her...
Die queer.
Activate @CPsGapingRosebud
The thread on which you are HIDING?Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 7:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Speaking of your lying, post your usual lie about this:
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
I haven't.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Post why you have been hiding for 5 months straight. Mr. Projection.
1. Same lie.
Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't.
Your question was answered..
You acknowledged it.
If true, then you would take this deal. You would finally get rid of me forever. But you know you are lying, so you won't.Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2026, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't.
Your question was answered..
You acknowledged it.
Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Prove it.Vegas » 22 Jan 2026, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Just as I predicted.
Same lie. Always the same exact lie. QED
the deal is that I post your acknowledgment and you kill yourself.