So it's a wash?Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you **** kidding?
Catering to your ignorance is expensive, Ruby...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom what's the link for, brown...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom How we got here?
Don't be afraid.
So buttons.
It’s not? What’s it’s about?Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Because it isn't about that, obviously.
Remember, you voted for a rapist felon, who wouldn't have been on the ballot - had we followed the laws on the books.
Nod.
I just showed you, you **** imbecile.BuckNaked » 08 Jan 2026, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s not? What’s it’s about?
Where was he convicted of that? Who would have decided he could not be on the ballot?
Oh look. Veghead dodging Buck's questions. How unlike him. Watch him demand Buck to answer his. His own standards don't apply to him.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Please show me again
I see nuttin tellin us what it’s aboutBlackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Because it isn't about that, obviously.
Remember, you voted for a rapist felon, who wouldn't have been on the ballot - had we followed the laws on the books.
Nod.
I see no reason to answer to your "powers of observation".
ICE is now spending 180 billion per year. Civil Rights are being routinely violated, court orders flaunted and now Americans are being killed. Over a **** "mnemonic device" for a pixilated sock puppet.
QED.
to answer to
What mnemonic device? PuzzlinBlackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ ICE is now spending 180 billion per year. Civil Rights are being routinely violated, court orders flaunted and now Americans are being killed. Over a **** "mnemonic device" for a pixilated sock puppet.
Now tell me what, specifically, you find so puzzling...
The 2nd sentence of the citation, IN **** BOLD.BuckNaked » 08 Jan 2026, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ What mnemonic device? Puzzlin
enforce all laws on the books or get rid of them