Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 9:29 pm

Coozie,

A) your incessant caterwauling might find traction were you to include some....you know....evidence. 

B) The OP is a video 90 minutes long. Who the **** needs 90 minutes to read a few paragraphs establishing the relevant facts at issue?

You're a ******...live with it.

Coozie is just a speck tater..

roadkill » 08 Jan 2026, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 12:19 pm

I don't believe I just did that...I gave you a greenie.      

CP immediately fined me...       

Peanuts Align

Ditto 

Cannonpointer » 08 Jan 2026, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 11:42 am

youtube /watch?v=7HgM0aI3IK8

Pee on the nuts CP..

Cmon man, who wants to watch that shyt?

Can you provide a synopsis for discussion?

Or at least time stamps we should pay attention  to?

My paygrade here doesn't  cover 90 minutes  of White Eminem  Slim Shadiness
 

Cannonpointer » 08 Jan 2026, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 12:14 pm

Oh, absolutely. You can **** off, since the video was not intended for you.

Not by its author. Not by the OP. You are not being addressed.

   

ROG62 » 09 Jan 2026, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 6:36 am

 

Your windmill spins on a biased wind ROG..
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jan 2026, 4:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 4:44 am

We'll take that as an indication  you didn't  spend 90 minutes watching it and have any dialogue regarding the subject.

Watching Tucker is hard. His laugh and manner is worse than Kamala  in my opinion..

You and your only friend?

btw
I've read books by Dostoevsky based on "recommendations" here on NHB.
Have you ever done anything similar? I'm sure your judgement is based on the least amount of effort needed to foster your narrative. Whatever a pothead can take... 6 to 7 minutes is taxing.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2026, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 9:29 pm

Coozie,

A) your incessant caterwauling might find traction were you to include some....you know....evidence. 

B) The OP is a video 90 minutes long. Who the **** needs 90 minutes to read a few paragraphs establishing the relevant facts at issue?

You're a ******...live with it.

I have never complained to moderators about a fellow poster. Not even once.
But then, I'm not a weak twat who whines to the teacher about a bully when my pigtail is pulled.

You have incessantly. As a troll, you should learn to take it as well as dish it out.
Luckily you have an ankle biter for a lapdog now. You both have a little echo chamber all your own.
 

DeezerShoove » 09 Jan 2026, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 8:43 am

I have never complained to moderators about a fellow poster. Not even once.
But then, I'm not a weak twat who whines to the teacher about a bully when my pigtail is pulled.

You have incessantly. As a troll, you should learn to take it as well as dish it out.
Luckily you have an ankle biter for a lapdog now. You both have a little echo chamber all your own.

 

I have never complained to moderators about a fellow poster. Not even once.

You're a moderator, inclined to abuse his discretion, complaining about a forum participant....while eagerly enabling a recidivist spammer

 I'm not a weak twat who whines to the teacher about a bully when my pigtail is pulled.

 You shut me down for several days, whining twat.

Because you had a brief taste of what you consider funny..

Less self serving narrative, Putzie...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2026, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 8:51 am

You're a moderator, inclined to abuse his discretion, complaining about a forum participant....while eagerly enabling a recidivist spammer

 You shut me down for several days, whining twat.

Because you had a brief taste of what you consider funny..

Less self serving narrative, Putzie...

You tagged me for most of your posts (like you're beginning to do again) just to bother me with irrelevancies.  After a week of tolerance and giving you a warning or two, what does a tantrum child expect? You expect something to happen so you can point it out and whine even more. Just like you are doing now.

btw
My comment was regarding my experience as a poster throughout my cyberlife,
not as a **** moderator, you absolutely dense asshole.
 
 

DeezerShoove » 09 Jan 2026, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 8:57 am

You tagged me for

NO NARRATIVES, COOZIE.

YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY.


 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2026, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 8:59 am

NO NARRATIVES, COOZIE.

YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY.

Okie dokie, troll.
I musta touched a nerve with some truth.
Thanks for the verification.  

DeezerShoove » 09 Jan 2026, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 9:40 am

Okie dokie, troll.
I musta touched a nerve with some truth.
Thanks for the verification.

If you need to retell it, it is highly unlikely to be true.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:42 am

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HgM0aI3IK8

Babies are watching a lot of YouTube, and this expert is concerned


https://www.washingtonpost.com/parentin ... ube-study/
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 10:03 am

If you need to retell it, it is highly unlikely to be true.

Why do you repeat the same posts then?
That seems to indicate you're admitting to being a liar.
You get lasties, troll.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2026, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 11:46 am

Babies are watching a lot of YouTube, and this expert is concerned

no spam

Pedoroad shared a tuber that came on my feed.  I find the young mans perspective informative. He is in Russia and appears unbiased. He may just be AI Generated to look like Moscow..  I don't know, anyway what the tuber says makes some sense. He is not a total Putin Kid. So it surprised me roadkill shared it.

Based on the experience above,  I don't think pedo watches his own youtubes.
 
 
 

JohnnyYou » 09 Jan 2026, 4:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 4:52 am

Pee on the nuts CP..

Cmon man, who wants to watch that shyt?

Can you provide a synopsis for discussion?

Or at least time stamps we should pay attention  to?

My paygrade here doesn't  cover 90 minutes  of White Eminem  Slim Shadiness

No.

The way to address a long-*** vid is to start by hitting play. If you don't find yourself intrigued and wanting to hear more, hit stop. 

I will tell you this much. What interested me most about Tucker's take is that he said this is not new. That only the optics are new. This is the same **** Biden was doing. But Biden dressed it up in human rights and rules based order ****. Which was ****. But what Trump did is mask-off. And that is a new phase of empire. 

I found that argument very interesting, because it leads to a number of considerations. 
 

DeezerShoove » 09 Jan 2026, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2026, 2:01 pm

Why do you repeat the same posts then?
That seems to indicate you're admitting to being a liar.
You get lasties, troll.

No he doesn't.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm

Trump openly admitted what his motivation is
Trump proved that our military is capable of executing a "Black Ops" stealth operation with surgical precision.

Against a third world country we already softened up by ten years of stealing their sovereign treasure and preventing them from trading.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm

I think MAGA [all 80 million of us] wants to see Venezuela given a chance to regain it's former status as the Western Hemisphere's 3rd leading economy [MVGA]

There are less than amillion in MAGA. I think you're talking about MIGA, when you use the number 80 million.

And it doesn't make a **** what MIGA OR MAGA wants. What matters is what israel wants. It is his master's bidding that the orange dog will do.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm

So far I have yet to see any of the TOTALLY OVER JOYED Venezuelans interviewed in the street that are not aware of the oil export issue and the fact that Trump unilaterally ordered this operation...but at this point they  don't seem to care.

Don't be so trusting of your eyes and ears. Y'know those fakes on youtube where a parrot rescues a chicken from an owl, or a goat saves a cat from an eagle, or a puppy fights a wolf to save a child? Those are produced by amateurs. Before our masters let us get our hands on THAT deep-fake machinery, they had next-next-gen at their disposal.

In the real world, venezuealans are not throwing flowers. They elected Maduro, as they had elected Chavez before him. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2026, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2026, 9:27 pm

No.

The way to address a long-*** vid is to start by hitting play. If you don't find yourself intrigued and wanting to hear more, hit stop. 

I will tell you this much. What interested me most about Tucker's take is that he said this is not new. That only the optics are new. This is the same **** Biden was doing. But Biden dressed it up in human rights and rules based order ****. Which was ****. But what Trump did is mask-off. And that is a new phase of empire. 

I found that argument very interesting, because it leads to a number of considerations.

Well ok.. I hear ya.   Trump basically made Mrs Liberty work on the dance pole.  I do ponder that Trump is no worse at corruption than any other, he just blatantly exposes himself.. But the tripling of his net worth in 10 months is concerning.  He's like I gotta be one dollar richer than Putin.

It's an old addage with MAGA.  They're corrupt, so we might was well be to.  They are like "When you get bad we get worse".

Tucker is in desparation for the attention he had.  I would be suspect of anything he had to say.

MTG has a youtube channel that popped up with a new vid yesterday.  I clicked it on for a second, she looked sharp and started to talk and in repulsion I clicked back to look for another one.   No atch, Like or Subscribe for her.   Dan Bongino need to hide under the MAGA Rock.  He had an exit interview and looked tense.  If we could divert the sweat on his brow we could solve California's water crisis. Megyn Kelly would do better to start and Only Fans.

The whole media sphere is transforming through out all this shyt.  Like I said in another post on here.  Soon we will be able to paste the video link in AI and  get a summary report in seconds.  Will you concede Tucker's laugh is just as annoying as Kamala's?

 
 

JohnnyYou » 11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am

Well ok.. I hear ya.   Trump basically made Mrs Liberty work on the dance pole.  I do ponder that Trump is no worse at corruption than any other, he just blatantly exposes himself.. But the tripling of his net worth in 10 months is concerning.  He's like I gotta be one dollar richer than Putin.

So you are Putin's banker?

Or just a run of the mill unreliable narrator? Does it bother you to know that the unreliable narrator is a stock device in literature? I mean, it makes the type seem hackneyed.

JohnnyYou » 11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am

Tucker is in desparation for the attention he had.  I would be suspect of anything he had to say.

I suspect everyone. But I listen to the ideas they share.

JohnnyYou » 11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am

MTG has a youtube channel that popped up with a new vid yesterday.  I clicked it on for a second, she looked sharp and started to talk and in repulsion I clicked back to look for another one.   

She stood up to trump and MIGA. Are you a person with allergies and compulsions and tics and overreactions? You seem so.

JohnnyYou » 11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 12:33 am

Will you concede Tucker's laugh is just as annoying as Kamala's?

Yes.