Yes, JuCo...
partway where?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

nefarious101 » 09 Jan 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Is that your maiden name or are you one of those hyphenated beta boys?
B. V. Clitface-Dickhead.....you should change it to "Hey Shiit4Brains!", like your grandma used to call you
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

nefarious101 » 09 Jan 2026, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Is that your maiden name or are you one of those hyphenated beta boys?
B. V. Clitface-Dickhead.....you should change it to "Hey Shiit4Brains!", like your grandma used to call you



JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom a one handed circlejerk?Blackvegetable » 09 Jan 2026, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are YOU here?
You wanna see a mic drop?
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=99907

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom you still holding your dick?Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ it's a JuCo field dressing.
"But How Stupid, Master Vegetable?" - The @rog62 Edition
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Just like a bitch
So where is the author now, Hank?
No...
How about Grafty and Meadows?
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 4:04 am » wrote: ↑ How about Grafty and Meadows?
"I don't have time to learn that much!"