JuCo, get busy
you making chili?*Roshambo » 09 Jan 2026, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ JuCo, get busy
https://i.postimg.cc/yxdq8L1S/Saltine-Crackers.jpg
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom JuCo, start jerking
He never stopped.
Wouldn't 17.9 be better?Vegas » 09 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ For people like @Blackvegetable , who is incapable of basic mathematical computations, I'll compute it for him. Approximately 17.8% of illegals have been removed from the US since Trump took office (second term.).
Not bad since he has only been in office for a year. 14 million illegal immigrants are a lot. That is a huge undertaking. It's easy to let them in, as the senile pedo can attest, but removing them is a whole different scope. A lot of self-deportations are now in the millions. They don't want to **** around with ICE. Therefore, that rate is exponential, not linearly. I predict that all 14 million will be gone by the end of his term.
They're the reason you can't read.BuckNaked » 09 Jan 2026, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Not enough not fast enough those that were removed will return
This is great news...!!!Vegas » 09 Jan 2026, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ For people like @Blackvegetable , who is incapable of basic mathematical computations, I'll compute it for him. Approximately 17.8% of illegals have been removed from the US since Trump took office (second term.).
Not bad since he has only been in office for a year. 14 million illegal immigrants are a lot. That is a huge undertaking. It's easy to let them in, as the senile pedo can attest, but removing them is a whole different scope. A lot of self-deportations are now in the millions. They don't want to **** around with ICE. Therefore, that rate is exponential, not linearly. I predict that all 14 million will be gone by the end of his term.

Why else would you resent them so?
Someone must be at fault...
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
By the way...
na, I'll leave that up to you, palsy...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Have you seen that idiot's examples of "Survivorship Bias"?LowIQTrash » 09 Jan 2026, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ By the way...
Wouldn't it be a "logarithmic" function and not "exponential?"
Assuming a 17-18% removal rate per year of the existing "stock" (already a bit questionable claim but I'll let that one slide)...