Blackvegetable » Today, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑
I'll keep this Level 1, so you can catch up..
Just point out that the alternative is a Grifter who has been assessed more than 500 million in fraud judgements, and has testified under oath that his signed attestation of net worth are worthless.....and throw in that his auditor walked away from a decades worth of audits....just for **** and giggles.
Level 2 will delve into why you would ask such a stupid question.
Post anywhere in this question that is asking which party is less trustworthy. If you knew how to read and didn't have TDS level 10, then you would know.
Question: How can the dimocrat party ensure transparency and accountability in campaign finances to rebuild public trust after allegations of financial mismanagement?
New Rule!
Rule: I will ask my questions repeatedly until you answer. I never fall for your tactics, such as deflecting, lying, and your other cowardly ****.
Stipulations:
- You will need to repost your questions the number of times that I had to repost mine. If I ask 50 times, then you need to ask 50 times before I answer. Fair is fair.
- The rule applies to both of us. Unlike you, I am not a coward. Therefore, I don't break the rules.
- I will never give a flying **** about your opinion of said rule.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993