Liberal Forum

Skans » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

I am aware of this.  Doubtful there is much room for bias and manipulation when you are debugging code using Chat GPT.  But, what I'm saying is that the program you are using is not "intelligent" as we all understand intelligence to be. It is essentially a sophisticated machine attached to a very comprehensive set of databases. What it lacks is any ability whatsoever to learn from conversations or experiences.

Untrue. You are defining intelligence as we humans define it. That is a narrow view of what intelligence is. Calculators can be considered intelligent. It just isn't how we define it. AI can be trained to think like humans. That doesn't mean it is sentient like humans. In your example, AI's job wasn't to give you its opinion. It's job was to determine what humans predominantly believe it to be. AI was correct in saying that many cultures have different definitions of gender. They do. Ot wasn't saying that AI believes that, it was simply saying that is what many cultures around the world believe. Which is correct.