When it comes to this issue, semantics is important. It needs to be regulated. Anyone who doesn't understand AI would think otherwise. I work in developing some of the algorithms, machine learning, and neural networks. Unless it is regulated, then it will be dangerous.Skans » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Well, you and I just define intelligence differently. Semantics. In my definition of intelligence, the being/entity needs to be able to seek out information, learn on its own and have some level of innate curiosity to advance its own knowledge base. That does not necessarily mean it must be sentient. In fact, there are other AI bots out there that actually can do this to a limited degree. The problem is that without human intervention and limits on what the model can learn, such bots are prone to quickly becoming corrupted, easily manipulated and useless.
Also, I don't believe that many cultures have different definitions of gender. There is one culture, the leftest culture, that tries to manipulate people and society by re-defining things with overt lies. Leftists don't care about "gender". They care about tearing down normative culture and society. Redefining gender is just one tool it has to attempt this.
I agree with you about the gender issue. However, AI is correct. There are many cultures that define it differently. In fact, back in the days of Alexander the Great, there were biological men that were deemed women everywhere. It was accepted.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY