Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html
Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.
Excellent. Another OP where you outsource the entire argument to someone else’s quote, toss in some hazy metaphor about “The Master,” and call it a day. I assume the follow-up will be another 12-question interrogation about definitions you haven’t given yourself.
So here’s a real one for you:
If you agree with Cofnas' claim that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of governance, what structural or ideological factors do you think specifically undermine their ability to govern—beyond just “they’re stupid” or “Grifty bad”?
Don’t worry—I already have
dodge #83 engraved and ready. Go ahead and prove me right.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=90783&p=2628993#p2628993