23 Jul 2021 1:16 pm
It's better to be safe about it. This guy would be alive if he was vaccinated. Period. A mask is not a straight jacket. It's a simple thing to wear, and the data shows that it does work. Yes, most of those who are in danger are the elderly. But I would like to think that we should be compassionate enough to protect them by having all of us not get infected. If a young guy is infected, he could infect an elderly person. Sure, the young guy will be fine, but the elderly person that he/she has infected has a greater probability of becoming deathly ill. Why not get vaccinated to protect the elderly?GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Jul 2021, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you know what a healthy 30 year old's chances are from dying OF CV19 [and nothing else]...?
In our nation of 330 million do you think I could "CHERRY PICK" a story like this daily about ADVERSE VACCINATION REACTION / DEATH from our vast data base of information..?
I spent yesterday at a large hospital with a friend.
There were 75 ER Rooms.
I asked about CV19 cases and ALL the nurses and aides said they were not permitted to talk about that.....
If I asked the same question 10, 20, 30 or more years ago about a virulent outbreak do you think I would get the same "1984 BIG BROTHER" response from the workers..?..
I didn't see any obvious CV19 cases waiting to be seen.
No DOUBLE MASKED EMPLOYEES.....
At the admissions desk they didn't bother with CV19 screening, either....
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...