6 Mar 2026 10:55 am
*Roshambo » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is indeed quite confusing, with a multitude of differing scenarios. To clarify my stance, I voted for the individual who declared "no new wars," as I possess a strong dislike for conflicts. In my youth, I remember the radio broadcasting "breaking alerts," and just recently, while enjoying one of my favorite songs, I heard a report mentioning "breaking alerts: 2 bodies identified" or something similar.
Do you recall those instances in school when two individuals would engage in a fight "after school"? Once that altercation commenced, it became evident whether the so-called "bad ***" was genuinely formidable or merely a talker. I reflect on the war that Trump led us into and I distinctly remember the term "shock and awe." Frankly, "shock and awe" did not yield favorable results, and from what I observe, this current situation is not progressing well either.
Allegedly, China is interfering, and this conflict appears to be evolving into a proxy war, much like the one occurring in Ukraine. The War Theater
Exactly. This war with Iran will first be reframed as "just a conflict." Iran has landed missiles in Israel. Jordon won't tolerate missiles flying over their nation, even if they weren't meant for them. So, they will join America and Israel. Saudi Arabia doesn't want missiles landing in their nation even if they are aimed at American embassies. So, they also will join in soon. And it begins...
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...