Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Brother, you are so right.

It serves a purpose - a needful purpose. But so does shoveling ****, and I pay no attention to **** shovelers, either. 

It's like watching Little Benny Shapiro "destroy" a freshman college student. I just wanna turn away. Doesn't matter if I agree with shapiro. Picking low hanging fruit lacks dignity. 

Charlie Kirk did the same job, but respectfully and far more effectively. That's why they killed him and little benny still walks the street.

Some things I agree with Shapiro and Kirk, and some things I don't. However, you are right. They made a fortune off picking low hanging fruit. Debating naive college students? Seriously? Kirk was confronted a few times about that. His response was even more pathetic and a clear cop out. He said that we are two voters trying to discuss issues. That is productive. That moron. He could have debated very well respected and highly intelligent philosophers, atheists, or well known academic researchers who are also voters in America. They have a much longer reach to the other voters in America, so it would be more effective. But they are not easy prey. So he didn't go up against them.