@Blackvegetable Let's see if your rules apply to you, narcissist boy. Be prepared to prove your narcissism.
I have now authored the following paragraph. I know I authored it because I say I authored it. Under the newly discovered Rules of Forum Authorship, that should be sufficient unless someone can disprove it.
And remember: according to your own standard, I do not have to prove authorship. You have to disprove it.
Good luck. Try not to injure yourself moving the goalposts.
I have now authored the following paragraph. I know I authored it because I say I authored it. Under the newly discovered Rules of Forum Authorship, that should be sufficient unless someone can disprove it.
There. I wrote it. Now prove I didn’t.The philosophical significance of authorship lies not merely in the production of sentences, but in the continuity between intention, argument, style, and intellectual responsibility. A text is not simply a sequence of propositions arranged in grammatical order; it is the residue of a mind attempting to make itself answerable to a claim. To claim authorship, therefore, is not merely to assert possession over words, but to assume responsibility for the conceptual architecture that gives those words their force. Where that responsibility is absent, authorship becomes a performance of ownership detached from the labor of thought itself.
And remember: according to your own standard, I do not have to prove authorship. You have to disprove it.
Good luck. Try not to injure yourself moving the goalposts.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...