Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

No...

A proof is a formal argument demonstrating the truth of an assertion. You cannot assert you have made such an argument in its absence.

Authorship is a claim. It is valid in the absence of contrary evidence. Copyrights are frequently challenged.

That this confounds you is a Vegas problem.

            You are so **** stupid. You just argued that your authorship claim is valid merely because you asserted it, then immediately argued that my AI-prompt claim is invalid merely because I asserted it. That’s not a contradiction I found. That’s one you gift-wrapped.