24 Jul 2021 1:36 am
FOS » 24 Jul 2021, 1:23 am » wrote: ↑ it means exactly that.
look...i can assure you that in the soviet union countless biologists knew damn well that darwinian evolution was the superior theory.
but the USSR outlawed darwinian evolution, instead insisting on lamarckism.
I seriously doubt that if you were some average guy in the USSR that there would be any chance you could figure out that lamarckism is false and darwinian evolution was simply better. And because scientists didnt want to go to prison, there is little chance they could inform you about that.
and anyway...what DOES the science say? under 1% of the people infected seem to die. Meaning that if you die, you were unlucky.
So compare...what are the odds that this 'vaccine' is worse than the disease...thanks to either malice or incompetence or both?
I think way over 1%. Especially because it is literally fiddling with your damn genetics. You are willing to give our leaders access to your genetics?
The difference is obvious. Evidently, in the USSR, the people had to do what they were told from the government. I choose to be vaccinated here. We all do. Their is no force.
Like I said, I am more worried about the mutations. That is what viruses do. They start off somewhat harmless to most of the population, but if they are allowed to mature, they turn into a **** formidable force that can kill millions. Malaria, smallpox, syphilis, marburg, HIV, ebola, hantavirus, dengue virus, rotavirus, SARS, and many more were mutations of a less deadly virus. These viruses have killed millions.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...