Today 11:37 am
It's just math. It has nothing to do with corruption or any human behavior.nefarious101 » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Not here...
Clean up the corruption and voter fraud you have an entirely new game..
we are a majority right center nation based on Judeo-Christian beliefs
there is still more that binds us as a nation that not....constant bickering just increases the temp
one party rule in a two party system exists out in the open
restricting candidate numbers is a form of censorship...it automatically destroys a free state
our main problem is the Left by using government and education has taught people they can vote themselves the keys to the treasury...free stuff
you make stuff harder to get....free stuff becomes more attractive
you make education **** we are back in the days of southern plantations...educating your slaves is bad...you need them dumb as a post....stupid is less like to act out or ask questions
there's a lot of work to do....and it's not gonna be pretty....I have a fondness for not pretty ...makes all this exciting
Assume we have three candidates that won the following percentage of votes:
Candidate A: 32%
Candidate B: 30%
Candidate C: 38%
So candidate C wins. But 32% + 30% = 62%. So that means 62% of society didn't want candidate C and only 38% did. That is it.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...