Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » Today, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:39 am

No, ****, it doesn't. You have 2 "minorities" that BOTH have their RIGHTS PROTECTED.

You really are THAT **** stupid. You can TRY to validate your stupidity with math if you want, but the REALITY OF HOW THINGS REALLY WORK IN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN CONFEDERATION don't math up with your premise. Because NO ONE LOSES ANY RIGHTS no matter what side you are one. IN A DEMOCRACY, THAT'S NOT TRUE, which is WHY our Founders HATED DEMOCRACY, pumpkin!!

And I don't need any "math" to prove that one.

Oh my God. Your mathematical aptitude is at the same level of BVs.

Here. Focus. Tell me how the electoral college in our republic will register this:

Candidate A: 37% of the votes
Candidate B: 31% of the votes
Candidate C: 32% of the votes.

Candidate A won the percentage. However, 32% + 31% = 63%. That means 63% of the people didn't want candidate A. Since we have an electoral system, then usually (with the exception of Nebraska and Maine) the electoral votes will go to the candidate who received the most votes. Then the overall electoral votes are counted nationally until someone reaches 270. So when a third candidate enters, then it's inherently flawed. Every state will always have far more people who didn't want the winner. 

Tell me how the tyranny of the minority is better than the tyranny of the majority.