Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...