Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:58 am

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board has eviscerated the “madness” behind President Donald Trump’s economic policy. 

Trump, 80, enacted a nearly 100-year-old tariff act to hit Canada with 50 percent levies on a plethora of goods, all because our northern neighbors hit the U.S. with retaliatory measures over Trump’s original penalty from March last year.

Trump, 80, enacted a nearly 100-year-old tariff act to hit Canada with 50 percent levies on a plethora of goods, all because our northern neighbors hit the U.S. with retaliatory measures over Trump’s original penalty from March last year.

The mess was described as “senseless” by the Murdoch-family-owned paper’s influential board. “The more Mr. Trump keeps swinging recklessly, the more Americans are likely to think there’s only madness in his tariff methods,” it wrote in an opinion piece on Tuesday.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/murdoch-p ... w-madness/

At least they're not that inflationary...

What's that?

PPI at 1.1%?

It's a damned good thing numbers don't tell a story, ain't it...

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.



I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.