11 Oct 2025 8:24 am
The situation is complex. The paragraph explaining the second home rider "characterizes the agreement rather than quoting it, an odd choice in this context," defense attorney and former federal prosecutor Ken White wrote on BlueSky. "Also note that the indictment claims she rented the property but not that she entered into an agreement that REQUIRED her to rent the property, which seems to be what is prohibited by the paraphrased language."ROG62 » 11 Oct 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ She's an attorney, not a waitress at the local Waffle House...you don't make mistakes like that...
"Prosecutors don't even bother to allege she ever entered into such an arrangement," Lawfare's Molly Roberts agrees, citing copies of documents released earlier this year. "All they allege is that she rented out the property, and that she didn't personally use it. That behavior, the rider doesn't prohibit."
yeah you 
--->Read me : )
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
--->Read me : ) Yer…. Entertaining and I make you
. Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it.Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??