17 Jun 2020 3:24 am
crimsongulf » 16 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems that he was provided the info freely and he did nothing to obtain it "illegally".
So, I guess I need a clarification. If a person is exposed due to readily available online info accessible by anyone...is that an issue?
I know the case in this topic is different.
If you know that a poster named Jack had a car wreck in Tuscaloosa on Tuesday, because he said it on the open board so that anyone could follow the bread crumb, and then you find that only one fellow was in an accident that day in that place, posting the story would be doxxing.
This is an anonymous board. Any attempt to make it something else is an attack on the board. Anything which follows, "But ya see" is inadmissible in mitigation.
You are known to be a man of reason, and I know your question is rooted in curiosity, not malicious intent. But you see, there are no "But ya sees." There are only the rules, and they are made of steel. A give here and a take there leads to this depravity:
AnnoyedLiberall » 16 Jun 2020, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑ Why would you give some **** poster access to someone's private messages?
That's really low.