4 Mar 2020 3:15 pm
The ones who try and pass the standards and have the economic need should be the priority for funding.Cannonpointer » 04 Mar 2020 3:03 pm » wrote: Yeah, here's the thing: I am 100% in favor of a socialized higher education system. 100%.
But you girls n the left need to understand and embrace that there will be - absolutely must be - rigorous standards, against which being born with a melanin abundance has no merit whatsoever. If you look at the wonderful and abundant examples available of socialized higher education, you will find that they all feature annual board exams which are extremely rigorous and designed to weed out all but the competent - all but those possessed of sufficient native intelligence and drive to succeed that they actually BELONG at university, actually bring excellence to the institution.
So you can stop jacking off to racial quotas, gender quotas, NON-gender quotas, victims-of-any-and-all-stripes quotas - basically, QUOTAS. University will be, again at last, for the educable.
Can you live with THAT? Because THAT is what you call for, when you call for socialized education. It ain't gonna be day care, anymore.
And not to strip the skunk cabbage of its charm, but rigorous, double blind studies have shown conclusively (albeit unpopularly, to the shrieks of the genderatti) that race plays a major role in IQ, and IQ plays a major role if educability. The net effect of this is that tomorrow's bourgeoisie in an America with socialized higher education will inexorably, inevitably be composed of MORE, not LESS, caucasian, Asian and jewish males. And FOR this fact, I apologize on behalf of Jesus, who made this joint, but there you **** well have it, son. Like it, don't like it - that's the hard, cold truth of the matter.