6 Apr 2017 9:18 am
Huey » 06 Apr 2017 9:11 am » wrote:
You do understand what the words "thought" and "may" mean?
Hell, with no proof whatsoever you have convicted the trump team of colluding with the Russians to influence the election.
There is more evidence that Rice was the individual who asked to unmask names, which is sorta legal. Additionally, there is coincidental evidence that this, in conjunction with the Jan 3 order that allowed the raw intelligence to be shared with 16 agencies and the Farkas comments about saving as much as possible is a co-ordinated effort to undermine the current administration. Add to that the POSSIBILITY (you know what that means, right?) that the targeted foreign officials who were under surveillance were chosen simply because it was known the trump transition team would speak to them and you have the makings of a grand conspiracy, illegal use of the surveillance program and actions that make watergate look like a jaywalking ticket.
But hell, it is more important to continue to whine about trump claiming Obama ordered his phones tapped.
It's not legal if there was no justification for it.
Leaking is definitely a crime.
If it is ever proved that Rice did it for political reasons it will be way worse than Watergate.