Liberal Forum

Vegas » 14 Jan 2026, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2026, 2:48 pm

So you are claiming that those handful of people you showed represent all of the Venezuelan people? That massive crowd celebrating was AI I guess. The Venezuelan-Americans celebrating here in the US is also AI. 

**** idiot.

  deflecting from Greenland?

how unlike you to run   


Q . will greenland let us put up a defense system

AI Overview

+7Greenland, as part of the Kingdom of Denmark, already hosts U.S. military bases under a 1951 defense agreement, allowing for U.S. military activities, but Greenlanders and Denmark oppose U.S. sovereignty or major control, with Denmark increasing its own Arctic defense while Greenlanders fear loss of autonomy and resources despite the U.S. push for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system on the island for strategic reasons
. 
Current Situation & Agreements

• 1951 Defense Agreement: This treaty grants the U.S. legal rights to operate military bases, like the Pituffik Space Base, in Greenland, which is governed by Denmark.
• U.S. Strategic Interest: The U.S. views Greenland as crucial for Arctic defense, missile interception (Golden Dome), and countering Russian/Chinese influence, as noted by President Trump's recent demands for U.S. control.
• Danish Position: Denmark, while acknowledging U.S. security needs and agreeing to expand cooperation, refuses to sell or cede control, viewing it as a sovereign part of the Kingdom. 

Greenland's Stance & Public Opinion

• Not For Sale: Greenland's leaders and people firmly state the island is not for sale, emphasizing self-determination.
• Resource Concerns: Some Greenlanders believe the push for control is driven by untapped natural resources, not just security.
• Fear of Losing Autonomy: There are fears that U.S. control would erode Greenland's autonomy and benefits from being part of Denmark (healthcare, education). 

Increased Military Activity 

• Joint Efforts: In response to geopolitical tensions, Denmark and Greenland are increasing their defense presence and military exercises in the Arctic in coordination with NATO, as highlighted in recent high-level meetings. 

In Summary: While the U.S. has existing rights for military bases and seeks more control for defense, Greenland and Denmark are resisting U.S. sovereignty, preferring increased NATO cooperation and their own enhanced Arctic defense capabilities.