Today 9:14 am
1st 2nd 3rdConservativeWave » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ HA!! YOU would LIKE to THINK I don't know what it is... but the TRUTH is, I think I know MORE about it, than YOU would like other people to know... FOR INSTANCE...
1) It is a voting method by which ALL the candidates are ranked by preference... BUT
2) HOW do you determine who wins when you have diluted all the multiple "preferences" into one ballot... and NO ONE actually wins?
3) WELL, THEN you apply various processes to determine who the winner is, and it becomes a vote counting NIGHTMARE, and a CESSPOOL of CORRUPTION... which is...
4) IS EXACTLY what CORRUPT politicians LOVE, because they can make the numbers turn out ANY WAY they WANT them to come out... REGARDLESS who actually WON !!
Ranked Voting = CORRUPT Voting... because when voting is TOO complicated, it leads to VOTE Tampering, Manipulation, and CORRUPTION !! ...and
It's NOT REALLY that "Funny" !
like 1 Rand Paul .. 2 tRump .. 3 Rubio
if Rand Paul didn’t generate enough votes … your vote would go for tRump … if tRump didn’t win the count … your vote would go to Rubio
its not that complicated
its just the one party systems way to scare people from voting for an alternative to them
it would illuminate the old “you are just throwing your vote away”
I would prefer ranked voting in the general and primaries
but it could get the job done if only used in the primaries
