Today 12:57 pm
Educate your own ********Beekeeper » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ NOW you are REFUSING to show us how RANKED CHOICE VOTING ACTUALLY WORKS and how VOTERS ARE DISENFRANCISED if their FIRST CHOICE CANDIDATE doesn't have enough votes to either win outright OR get into a run off!!
Let's try this again....
CAN YOUR BALLOT BE TOSSED IF THE "run-off" goes 3-4-5 rounds to determine a winner??
GO!! SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL DO, COCKLYSUCKER!
it works in many areas
quit being a useful idiot for the one party system
RCV WINS ON THE BALLOTIn 2023, voters in seven cities voted in favor of preserving, adopting, or expanding RCV – growing its winning streak to 27 city ballot measure wins in a row!
- Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak, Michigan all said YES to RCV in November 2023! These cities are home to about 180,000 Michiganders, and will implement RCV pending state approval.
- Easthampton, MA voted to implement proportional RCV for multi-winner elections, with 60% voting yes. Easthampton already uses RCV in single-winner elections.
- Minnetonka, MN reaffirmed its support for RCV in the face of a repeal attempt. 59% voted in favor of keeping RCV – a larger margin than when RCV first won in 2020, showing that voters like RCV even more now that they’ve used it.
- Redondo Beach, CA said YES to RCV, with 77% voting in favor. Redondo Beach will join seven other California cities in using RCV.
- Burlington, VT said YES to RCV for a second time in three years, with 64% in favor. Burlington will expand RCV to apply to all municipal elections; it previously applied only to city council races.
https://fairvote.org/report/2023-a-year-in-review/
