17 Mar 2025 9:56 am
*Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Colt saying it was redesigned is not an interpretation.
The BATF saying the weapon was changed in basic design is not a re interpretation.
The military saying it is not an assault rifle/weapon is not a re interpretation.
Your source listing what was changed in the lower is not a re interpretation.
I have posted the changes today as well as multiple times in the past.
IT was designed for the civilian population and was never labeled a military weapon
Not according to Colt.IT was designed for the civilian population
Colt saying it was redesigned...
What weapon needed to be so changed?The BATF saying the weapon was changed in basic design
It is unambiguous evidence that something once DESIGNED was MODIFIED.Your source listing what was changed in the lower is not a re interpretation.