Today 9:20 am
OK.Cannonpointer » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yet the OP is about a very specific issue in that greatly stupid state.
And as usual, you wish to divert to another conversation, rather than contribute to the thread.
And this is because your ****** hurts, and you know you lack the chops to defend that which abbot is attacking.
You cannot attack abbot's POSITION, so you attack abbot, and you hope that I will take the bait - that I will allow a hump like you to divert my thread.
The place is city owned...
One might think it is up to the city....
Abbott has been playing theater on this issue for years...