Today 12:39 pm
Who on Earth could possibly be this stupid?MR-7 » Today, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ BV… you just proved my point.The study literally says the job losses were localized ripple effects in 86 metro areas — not national totals.The 51,000–297,000 number is the estimate of how many of those localized lost jobs were held by U.S.-born workers. That’s not a national job‑loss figure. That’s not a national economic report. And it sure as hell isn’t comparable to nationwide job creation. You’re mixing up a regional impact study with national employment data.
What do you believe comprises a "national total"?
I pay to keep you alive....