Yesterday 3:25 pm
Sounds like?Huey » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And now for the rest of the story......Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.
After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.
AND
Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/p ... =url-share
Sounds like the right thing was done here, a wrong was righted, and still you bitch.
To whom?
Pirro was going to get skinned by a judge.
No one "did the right thing".....they did the wrong thing so badly they had to abort.