Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,874 posts
ROG62 » 20 Aug 2026, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑
A screenshot of a screenshot that you originally posted which looks to be the TOC of a court archive that indicates a verdict of no rape by defendant, possibly DJT…
anything else?
Huey avatar Huey +5 17 minutes ago
You're a pair of ineducable cretins.
It is the index from the Petition of Team Grifty seeking relief from the jury's assessment.
What is circled is a CLAIM, not a fact.
"B...B...B...but verdict form!!!!!.....(....sob...)"
How can we be 100% certain that the finding is entirely irrelevant?
Ask yourself what the consequence would have been of a FINDING of Guilty.
The answer - because you know
@ROG62 and
@Huey will run like sniveling bitches from their own questions - is "NOT A **** THING"
Now can one of you dimwits tell me at what level of appeal Team Grifty's argument PREVAILED?
:rofl:
Sweep that crap outta here.