Here we go again.Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was %100 percent on objective facts. DB posted a false tweet in an article on Monday to use the article to hammer fox.
Don't get any more factual than that.
There was nothing "false" about the tweet.
In fact, here's the response of a FOX dependent slack jaw - as of 2;08 pm on the 11th - when asked as follows:
Don't know anything about that either,So is FOX spinning this Guilfoyle thing as evidence of the incorruptibility of the Grifty administration?
I'd say that pretty much nails someone's dick to the wall.