1 2 3 4 5 8
User avatar
O.E.
4 Aug 2017 12:35 pm
User avatar
 
8 posts
larryc12 » 04 Aug 2017 11:34 am » wrote:The President of the United States has the right to discuss classified information with whomever he wishes. Hillary never had any such right to handle classified information the way she did. You know that. You just have the double standard working for you. It's great to be a democrat.

Hillary Clinton has been proven to have willfully and unlawfully handled Top Secret information. She walked away unscathed, but we have Mueller out there organizing grand juries searching for something to hang on Trump or associates. If he or they have committed crimes, then indict them, but Hillary is already known to have committed crime after crime and to this point, nothing is done about it. Do you believe in the rule of law or not? Or is it just the "if and when" scenario for you?
Say, Larry, how long have you been running with that putrid collection of myths? All do it, Dems do worse, but get away Scot free, while Special Prosecutors only go after the GOP?

The Trumpy actually transferred information, classified at the highest level, to a hostile nation, undermining or even destroying the international intelligence cooperation upon which we depend for our security. There is no evidence that any of the information Hillary had on her private server ever leaked out, and you can bet your arse, if it had, we'd have heard about it by now. The Trumpy gets a pass from you, Hillary doesn't.

Oh yeah, then there's the little fact that Hillary did just as Powell did before her, and several dozen White House officials doing official business, amounting to tens of millions of emails, over a - private! - RNC server. So yes, there's precedent for the way in which Hillary proceeded, upon Powell's advice. Powell gets a pass from you, so do several dozen Bush White House officials, Hillary doesn't.

Moreover, remember Starr? Need I say more? Ah yes, in your view it is the height of injustice that Mueller goes after the Trumpy every which way a competent prosecutor would, installed by, wait for it, a Republican-appointed assistant AG. This assistant AG had no other way to proceed after the Trumpy admitted he fired the formerly investigating FBI chief (the same who investigated Hillary) because Comey wouldn't let the Russia investigation go. So, the Trumpy in his very finite wisdom, brought this prosecutor upon himself. Cue your whining about it. That Hillary had been investigated by the very man the Trumpy fired doesn't show up in your account.

But hey, Hillary is known to have "committed crime after crime", crimes you don't bother to name, so-called "crimes" the FBI boss, whom the Trumpy fired, didn't think warranted charges (neither did anyone else in the U.S. justice system who had a say on the matter, including one Mr. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions), but the Trumpy does get a pass from you, whereas Hillary doesn't.

You know what is funny about that? I'll tell you: All of it. Most of all that you would even so much as try to dress up with an equitable flair. Really, Larry, do realize you yourself are the punch line of a joke you forgot to tell.
1 2 3 4 5 8
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum