7 Dec 2022 7:58 am
I'd feel attacked if any of that was true. But it isn't and I wish you a good morning.Cannonpointer » 07 Dec 2022, 12:17 am » wrote: ↑ You commonly make arguments based on assumptions that are ENTIRELY false. When those assumptions are debunked, you do two slimey things:
1. You quite often fail to own your error, just fading away, or immediately moving the goal post to not have to shift positions;
2. Even when you do half way own your error, you will often turn around and repeat that error in another thread on another day.
The blithe manner in which you are willing to make claims based on an unstudied and unsupported foundation could be chalked up to lack of deep interest in a given subject or a rare failure to dot I's and cross T's, IF it were not habitual. But it is.
The route jack in the box took - just to walk away without even RESPONDING to a thorough debunking of his thesis - is one to which you are no stranger.
You and he are mediocre intellectual lightweights.