24 Jul 2023 12:30 pm
They had not broken any laws yet .......had GW continued the surveillance he could have intervened howeverZ09 » 24 Jul 2023, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ You claim Clinton had these terrorists under surviellence....
Why didn't he?
he apparently thought these terrorists were of no concern thus he dropped the tax dollar support that covered
the surveillance = yes the president must approve these matters. Could be he was not fully aware of his duties yet.......................... he was a green horn about then.