5 Aug 2023 3:11 pm
THAT is why 5 are suggested ............. all of them are in place here and there as we speak .............Beekeeper » 05 Aug 2023, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ One TINY little problem there ****!!!
NONE of those can provide 100% RELIABLE ENERGY WHEN NEEDED!!! NOT A SINGLE ONE!!!
So you advocate DESTROYING our nations ECONOMIC ENGINE with totally UNRELIABLE ENERGY SOURCE(S) and allow other nations like India and China to RULE THE WORLD since they are telling the WORLD TO **** OFF RIGHT NOW and using RELIABLE ENERGY LIKE COAL AND NAT GAS!!
So you admit you are a **** MORON, AGAIN!!
Radioactive waste sucks and can live thousands of years all RadioActive fly ash from coal ie quite dangerous ......... so we keep HYDRO POWER plus 4 other sources.