8 Aug 2023 2:05 am
"To facilitate the efficient production of discovery to the defense, the Government proposed a reasonable protective order consistent with current practice in this District," the special counsel's team wrote.
"To safeguard witness privacy and the integrity of these proceedings, the Court should enter the Government's proposed protective order."
In contrast, the special counsel argued, Trump's proposed protective order "would lead to the public dissemination of discovery material."
Late Monday night, Judge Chutkan responded to the filing by ordering the special counsel and Trump's legal team to give her two proposed dates and times by Tuesday at 3 p.m. for a hearing on their dueling protective order motions.
The judge said she wants the hearing to take place before Friday, and is not requiring Trump's appearance.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/proposed-prot ... =102084393
"To safeguard witness privacy and the integrity of these proceedings, the Court should enter the Government's proposed protective order."
In contrast, the special counsel argued, Trump's proposed protective order "would lead to the public dissemination of discovery material."
Late Monday night, Judge Chutkan responded to the filing by ordering the special counsel and Trump's legal team to give her two proposed dates and times by Tuesday at 3 p.m. for a hearing on their dueling protective order motions.
The judge said she wants the hearing to take place before Friday, and is not requiring Trump's appearance.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/proposed-prot ... =102084393