13 Jan 2023 10:33 am
In English your second language? Nothing in EO 13526 protects former presidents from the requirement to follow the constraints of US Law, and it doesn't even mention the Espionage Act. To suggest that the clown is exempt from that Act is nonsensical. No one is saying that the clown did not have access and clearance to see classified material. His current access is limited by his need to know. And NOTHING allows him to share information that may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, or to allow anyone else access to such information. Did he do that? Jack Smith will tell us all soon enough. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict that, because @Beekeeper said there was no sharing, Jack Smith is not going to take that as fact and NOT do his own investigation and make his own determination.Beekeeper » 13 Jan 2023, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ There was no "sharing", SFB. None. So you lose there.
And again, read Obama's EO on Declassification of Documents. An INCUMBENT PRESIDENT is fully protected and any documents in his/her possession are ALSO protected from any laws that are used against anyone OTHER than a President/Incumbent President. ESPECIALLY the ones he had access to as PRESIDENT.
You really are one argumentative moron if you think you have something here, because you have NOTHING buy BS "talking points" without ONE SHRED OF LEGAL PRINCIPLES backing it. I do.