16 Jan 2023 8:48 am
If the president of the united states pulled out a gun and murdered someone on national television from his desk in the white house, could he not be charged with that crime?Beekeeper » 16 Jan 2023, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ You seem to think that you can use ANYTHING you want in applying the Espionage Act, when the FACTS ARE that the system to classify and declassify information was established for the SOLE PURPOSE of determining what IS and what ISN'T information that can be public knowledge. Therefore, anyone invoking the Espionage Act has a means to determine if anything that was CLASSIFIED has been used to the harm of this nation.
It must really suck for you when you get your arse kicked massively and all you can do is keep beating that same dead mule in some effort to turn it into some "truth" that it will NEVER be.
If the president of the united states anally raped a woman bending her over the Resolute Desk on national television for all to see, could he not be charged with that crime?
If a president of the united states took a highly classified document with names of hidden and embedded US agents on it and for no rational reason other than his own personal enrichment gave this supposedly declassified document to a russian government official in return for favorable financing terms for his new office building in Moscow, and the clear result of that disclosure was the execution of all of those agents he had disclosed, and their deaths undoubtedly caused the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, it is your assertion that the mere statement of declassification of those documents somehow magically changed them into harmless sheets of paper, the deaths of those agents became perfectly acceptable and the president was immune from indictment because the "unclassified document" somehow was no longer sensitive based solely on the decree of the rogue president?? Do yo have any idea how ridiculous that assertion of yours is?