17 Jan 2023 8:10 pm
The discussion was about votes on bills in the Senate. If you had meant to say Yes *******, fifty senators are all that are needed to pass a bill if all senators are present and voting" you should have said that.golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I'm saying that you are doing what you always do, tell half the truth, because you're a liar with no honor.
You know the discussion was about Senators voting.
You didn't. You used the word VOTES, not senators. I didn't force you to use that word.. YOU USED IT...and it has a meaning... and the statement as written is wrong. You have NEVER admitted it was wrong.
And the funny thing is, EVEN IF YOU DO CHANGE VOTES TO SENATORS, it's STILL wrong.... because the Vice President has to ALSO want the bill to pass. If she doesn't. She simply walks out of the chamber.... and the measure fails to pass 50-50. So fifty senators are not all that is needed... you need fifty senators AND a vice president if all senators are present and voting.
OOOPS
hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaahha