24 Jan 2023 8:30 am
If mere possession were synonymous with intent to retain, then intent to retain wouldn't be an element of the crime.theBuffalo » 24 Jan 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Matlock, intent is not required for it to be a crime. But clearly having those classified documents in multiple locations for years is proof of intent.
I want to know what braindead biden and his crackhead son did with them during that time. Why is that question not being asked.
Oh, officer, I did not intent to drive 80 mph in that 55 mph speed zone. Do you think that LIE matters to the officer?
You should stick to dumpster diving behind the burger barn fo you meals...
Clearly... possessing documents is one thing.... knowingly, purposefully intending to retain them is another.
One is not proof of the other.
I'd stick to flipping burgers if I were you.