Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2023, 1:08 am » wrote: ↑
"Innoculation" has a definition. The experiment did not
innoculate those who received it.
IF YOU REALLY SERVED, you took an oath. As a sworn defender of the Constitution, you are RESPONSIBLE to know that treaties passed pursuant thereto are organic law of the land to precisely the same degree that the Constitution is: that is,
absolutely law of the land.
We are party to treaties codified in the Nuermeberg Code, including but not limited to the Geneva Conventions.
The Nuremberg Code - again, codified treaties to which we are signatory and indeed of which we were the originators - EXPRESSLY forbids coercing, compelling or extorting any person, whether civilian or military, free or incarcerated, citizen or non-citizen, to participate in medical experiments. The Covid "vaccine" was (
AND IS) still experimental under U.S. law when soldiers were forced to take it in contravention of the afore-mentioned treaties. You can play stupid all you like. The law remains the law; your oath remains your oath. Your blithe narrative ignoring these facts and defending these violations is itself a reneg of your oath to defend the Constitution. I swore no such oath, yet I am defending what you swore to defend against your lies.
You might have been an officer. You are a liar and an oath breaker and no gentleman.
That's what I said, dummy. You defend - in this case, through minimization - the precise behavior you screech about from the other side. You are a hack, and evidence means nothing to you.
I'd rather discuss how you feel about deflection, traitor to your oath.
Oh, wait - you favor it. Never mind.