29 Jan 2023 2:25 pm
Your characterization of Medicare for all is inaccurate. Nothing in any of he proposed legislation sets wages for health care workers, and the "means for all healthcare" is a nonsensical sentence. Socialism requires government ownership. And there will ALWAYS be a for profit aspect to healthcare... Elective surgeries right off the top of my head. there is a whole swath of medicine that is not covered by Medicare today and would not be covered by Medicare for all. Here is an interesting article published by the NIH:Beekeeper » 29 Jan 2023, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ So you support SOCIALIZED MEDICINE and fail to comprehend that WHEN "Medicare for All" is implemented that GOVERNMENT controls the wages and the MEANS for all health care in this nation. That, by YOUR VERY OWN DEFINITION, is SOCIALISM!! There will NO LONGER be any "for profit" ANYTHING regarding medical care.
Do you think that Doctors and Hospitals get paid TODAY based on what they bill Medicare?? Nope, they don't, but they currently GET whatever Medicare says they will get, doofus!! Make that a program MANDATED by government for everyone, and you have FULL CONTROL OVER WAGES AND INCOMES OF ALL MEDICAL PERSONNEL with GOVERNMENT CONTROL!!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110239/